home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT1353>
- <title>
- May 22, 1989: Hard Times For Teflon Tom
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- May 22, 1989 Politics, Panama-Style
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- NATION, Page 35
- Hard Times for Teflon Tom
- </hdr><body>
- <p>Los Angeles' mayor faces questions about conflict of interest
- </p>
- <p> Anyone who can boss Los Angeles for 16 straight years
- without falling on his face needs a bit of luck, a bit of skill
- or a thick coating of Teflon -- and maybe all three. Through
- four terms, Mayor Tom Bradley, 71, managed to keep his troubled
- nation-within-a-state from disintegrating completely without
- himself succumbing to hubris or, worse, scandal. A diffident,
- dedicated man, Bradley seemed the personification of rectitude.
- He never got too big for his britches. Bad judgment was
- something else.
- </p>
- <p> In January, after the mayor began his campaign for a fifth
- term, the Los Angeles Herald Examiner warned that it would
- publish a series of tough "challenges" on the city's problems,
- ranging from gang warfare to freeway gridlock. "We'll try not
- to let ((Bradley)) forget he's participating in an election, not
- a coronation," promised the newspaper. That threat did not sit
- well with Bradley. The Herald Examiner found itself shut out of
- the mayor's office: no press releases, no phone conversations,
- no personal contact -- an invitation, if there ever was one, for
- reporters to start scraping away at the Teflon. Result: three
- weeks before the election, the paper began running articles
- about the mayor's financial dealings. He is currently under
- investigation by city, state and federal authorities.
- </p>
- <p> The Herald Examiner reported that Bradley, who earns
- $102,000 annually as mayor, was engaged last year as an adviser
- to a Chinatown bank that paid him $18,000. Bradley also earned
- at least $70,000 as a director of a savings and loan bank for
- ten years. Although both matters were on public record and on
- the surface did not seem to represent a conflict of interest,
- the facts beneath the surface suggested otherwise. It turns out
- that city deposits in the Chinatown bank were doubled after
- Bradley made a phone call to the Los Angeles treasurer. The
- savings and loan bank, meanwhile, was involved in a
- multimillion-dollar tax dispute with the city, and had been
- awarded several zoning changes. Following those disclosures,
- Bradley repaid his $18,000 fee to the Chinatown bank and quit
- his job as director of the thrift institution, but the taint of
- impropriety remained. "Dubious moonlighting," the Los Angeles
- Times called it.
- </p>
- <p> "Dubious" certainly was the term for fresh disclosures that
- the city paid $400,000 to a trade task force run by a business
- associate of Bradley's. The Securities and Exchange Commission,
- moreover, is looking into the mayor's holdings in stocks, real
- estate and junk bonds; parts of Bradley's portfolio were
- handled by Drexel Burnham Lambert, whose deposed junk-bond king,
- Michael Milken, contributed to Bradley's political campaigns.
- </p>
- <p> It was a measure of the mayor's long-standing reputation
- for honesty that the shocker did not prevent his re-election to
- a record fifth term last month (though this time by a narrow
- margin), but he has resolved to exonerate himself. Bradley has
- appointed a commission to rewrite the city's ethics rules in a
- "clearer and cleaner" fashion, and last week told the city
- council, "While not a legal mistake, my decision to engage in
- outside employment was an error in judgment because of the
- possible perceptions it created; for that I accept
- responsibility. I assure you that this experience taught me a
- painful lesson. I am determined to learn from it."
- </p>
- <p> He may get his wish, but Tom Bradley's Teflon is gone.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-